Tag Archives: Henry George

Speaking of Cathay, Speaking of Trade, Speaking of Hudson…

Replica of De Halve Maen.

in 1609 Hudson was an unremarkable English seaman working for Dutch masters, doing the unremarkable (to them) English/Dutch sailing captain’s job of finding the Northwest Passage to Fabled Cathay. He failed of course but everybody did at that job, and they didn’t mind; they kept hiring him anyway. In the short and medium term, the real job of these voyages was the job of finding new wijk ports to extend the English-Dutch common trading network. As we know, Hudson’s inestimable success was in finding the Valley that bears the River that today bears his name. The North River, as the Dutch called it, has a perfect configuration for a wijk, or indeed, for many. It has deep harbors in a wide central bay at its mouth; for a long way upriver, there are vigorous tides for the effortless ebb and flow of traffic; and it is directly adjacent to willing and eager trading partners. The City, the cities, built on this estuary made the Hudson River the New Money River in the world, supplanting the Rhine. Hudson didn’t build New York, but he and his men did bring back plenty of extraordinarily soft beaver pelts. In Mokum they sold for a pretty stuiver soon after landing, to the keen-eyed merchants who crowded the Damraak and maybe slipped the Half Moon sailors and stevedores a little something to get a peek into their cargo. Several of those merchants immediately chartered ships of their own, and there were Dutch traders smoking with Mohawks at Albany and Raritans on Staten Island from 1610. What made the amazing pelts so soft, what made them valuable, what gave them the perfectly trimmed nap, was that they had previously been worn by the Indians as their clothing. The most important and successful wijk trading city of them all, was built on carving the percent out of dealing in the Native Americans’ own second-hand jewelry and their own second-hand rags. Both industries, of course are still huge in New York. But if we take the Half Moon as a metaphor — Hudson certainly did find a route for Dutch-English trade to illuminate, penetrate and dominate the distant hemisphere, through the traders who built in his wake. It just took The Whirligig of Time, and a Gold Rush, and a whole lot more capital, for the wijks to open the passage to Cathay.

Full Disclosure: Bait and switch. The wise homily above was merely a ruse, to get Patient Reader to click on Michael Hudson’s latest interview on Nakedcapitalism.com. It is a sharp non-jargony reading of the China Question. He is that rare economist in America who actually seems to know and follow, and who cares about, where China is actually at…versus, where America is at, and how where we’re at is so far out into the Swamp of Ignorance, that the rest of the world has not only stopped following, but has given up even waving and calling out from the shoreline. Hudson explains why America’s plutocracy is just not where it’s at, for China, or the world, or the wijks, anymore. In other words, Hudson explains why China has de-monetized the Money River of Hudson.

Here is a link to Mr. Hudson’s excellent blog, full of the best of modern economic thought.

https://michael-hudson.com/

Marching Through Georgia — ‘The Land Song’

FOLK SONG ARMY DIV.

The View marks the amazing elections of SEN. RAPHAEL WARNOCK of Georgia; the first Black senator from the Peachtree State; and SEN. JON OSSOFF The first Jewish senator from the Peachtree state! Bring the good old bugle, boys!

Let’s celebrate these victories for Georgia, for democracy and for all Americans. These wins will bring a more progressive and more representative and fairer Union. I’ve been whistling “Marching Through Georgia” all week, cheering on the vote:

Bring the good old bugle, boys, we’ll sing another song
Sing with such a spirit it will start the world along,
Sing it as we used to sing it, fifty thousand strong
While we were MARCHING THROUGH GEORGIA!
Hurrah! Hurrah! We bring the Jubilee!
Hurrah! Hurrah! The flag that makes you free.
So we sang in chorus, from Atlanta to the sea,
While we were MARCHING THROUGH GEORGIA.

But to my astonishment and delight, I learned there is another important political song that was written to the tune of Marching Through Georgia. The Land Song, from Britain, is an inspiring and universal political anthem that anyone of goodwill can sing. It was — is? — the official song of the Liberal Party in the UK. (Four governments under Gladstone; then Campbell-Bannerman; Asquith; Lloyd George; as modern Liberal Democrats, Paddy Ashdown; Nick Clegg; and the Edinburgh chancellor while I was there, David Steel). The Land Song is a Georgist anthem! You remember, Patient Reader:

Sound the call for freedom boys, and sound it far and wide, 
March along to victory for God is on our side,
While the voice of Nature thunders o’er the rising tide,
“God gave the land to the people!”
The land, the land,
’twas God who made the land,
The land, the land,
The ground on which we stand,
Why should we be beggars
With the ballot in our hand?
God made the land for the people.

Hark the sound is spreading from the East and from the West,
Why should we work hard and let the landlords take the best?
Make them pay their taxes on the land just like the rest,
The land was meant for the people. [Chorus]
Clear the way for liberty, the land must all be free,
Liberals will not falter from the fight, tho’ stern it be,
‘Til the flag we love so well shall fly from sea to sea
O’er the land that is free for the people. [Chorus]
The army now is marching on, the battle to begin,
The standard now is raised on high to face the battle din,
We’ll never cease from fighting ’til the victory we win,
And the land is free for the people. [Chorus]

“Labour has “The Red Flag;” Conservatives sing “Land of Hope and Glory.” For Liberals, it’s always been “The Land.” — BBC reporter Andrew Whitehead, whose fascinating radio features about the song can be heard here:

“Way back in the early 1920’s, I heard “The Land Song” being sung, it was the one that really seemed to strike terror into the hearts and minds of the Landlords — as it should! It’s not only a Land song, and a Liberal song; it summarizes the whole democratic case.”

— Michael Foot, former Labour Party Leader. His interview with Whitehead about the song is heard below:

Hurrah! Hurrah!

What If We Gave An Economy, And Nobody Came?

THE DISMAL SCIENCE DEPT.

So, Patient Reader, you say you don’t understand economics, and you don’t want to? Do the charts and newsfeeds and TV crawls about “the economy” revolt you? Friend, I was just like you, and most of you know it. I hated Econ. and it made my head hurt and my heart ache and my stomach churn. It never enhanced my understanding of history or human behavior, in fact its dead operations and adolescent “game theory” approach of winners and losers almost always conflicted with what I felt was right. With all these odious physical reactions, and watching the course of world events, it has helped me to delve into basic principles, which (to be quite frank) were totally scrubbed from my entire formal education. Consult your own conscience, Patient Reader: who “taught you about money?” I bet you can tell me which years you spent in concentrated study on algebra or chemistry, or on the Sumerians, or Spanish. But which years in school gave you time for concentrated study on modern money supply, wealth, finance, or taxes? In seventh grade we were taught how to follow the stock market by picking stocks and reading the newspapers; mine never did anything. Other than that, my only formal class in “Business” was a typing class (valuable, but…) Understanding that economics means humanism, doesn’t make it hurt any less to read about the bloody mess mankind is making of the world. But it does feel good to know that you’re not crazy, and most of the people you love aren’t crazy, and that whatever is going on in the horrible world where phantom money inevitably destroys humanity’s real wealth ad infinitum, it isn’t economics.

Basic Forgotten Principe: Economics = Oikonomia = Stewardship

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.30.1.225

‘We know we belong to the land
And the land we belong to is grand!

–Oscar Hammerstein II

“Nearly every economist has at some point in the standard coursework been exposed to a brief explanation that the origin of the word “economy” can be traced back to the Greek word oikonomia, which in turn is composed of two words: oikos, which is usually translated as “household”; and nemein, which is best translated as “management and dispensation.” Thus, the cursory story usually goes, the term oikonomia referred to “household management”, and while this was in some loose way linked to the idea of budgeting, it has little or no relevance to contemporary economics. This article introduces in more detail what the ancient Greek philosophers meant by “oikonomia.” It begins with a short history of the word. It then explores some of the key elements of oikonomia, while offering some comparisons and contrasts with modern economic thought….

— Abstract of Dotan Leshem’s article on “Oikonomia,” cited in full below.

For example, both Ancient Greek oikonomia and contemporary economics study human behavior as a relationship between ends and means which have alternative uses. However, while both approaches hold that the rationality of any economic action is dependent on the frugal use of means, contemporary economics is largely neutral between ends, while in ancient economic theory, an action is considered economically rational only when taken towards a praiseworthy end. Moreover, the ancient philosophers had a distinct view of what constituted such an end—specifically, acting as a philosopher or as an active participant in the life of the city-state.”

— Abstract of Leshem, Dotan, 2016 “Retrospectives: What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by Oikonomia?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30 (1): 225-38.DOI: 10.1257/jep.30.1.225

Monopoly — The Fed Finally Sees The Cat

www.nakedcapitalism.com

“Do You See The Cat?” A Georgist political badge
from the 1890’s.

What cat? Where? What are you talking about?
I don’t see any cat.

“American policymakers are giving more and more credence to the role of monopoly concentration in the economic restructuring that started in 1980, in the Reagan/Thatcher era, that shifted power and rewards from labor to capital. Importantly, these experts don’t just see monopoly as a problem; even basic economic courses show in toy models that they increase prices and decrease output. They also acknowledge that stagnant wages, rising profit share of GDP and escalating wealth concentration are bad outcomes economically and societally. A new paper by Fed economists Isabel Cair ́o and Jae Sim describes how they developed a model to simulate the impact of companies’ rising market power, in conjunction with the assumption that the owners of capital liked to hold financial assets (here, bonds) as a sign of social status. They wanted to see it it would explain six developments over the last forty years, and it did!
Real wage growth stagnating and lagging productivity growth
— Pre-tax corporate profits rising rapidly relative to GDP
— Increasing income inequality
— Increasing wealth inequality
— Higher household leverage
— Increased financial instability

— Yves Smith, Naked Capitalism blog, August 19, 2020

Hello, Kitty….

“The history of Monopoly can be traced back to 1903, when American anti-monopolist Lizzie Magie created a game which she hoped would explain the single tax theory of Henry George. It was intended as an educational tool to illustrate the negative aspects of concentrating land in private monopolies. She took out a patent in 1904. Her game, The Landlord’s Game, was self-published, beginning in 1906.

— Thus Quoth Wikipedia

Remember Henry George? The Philly boy who took ship and made good?

Monopoly, whether the board game, or the social suffocation, is death: the final squeeze of the octupus. But it is merely the end-point of the long squeeze, which is our morbid, irresponsible and socially destructive 40-year drive to concentrate wealth and poverty, back to the Gilded Age point that society is driven to extremis, which, folks, is where we are now.

During my lifetime, the wise precautions and regulations of the preceding 150 years of Progressivism, The New Deal, and The Great Society, have been thrown down, to re-admit the insidious octopus of Monopoly back into “our economy.” The drive towards monopoly is a feature, not a bug, of our current real estate laws, our tax laws, and our corporate governance. Ronald Reagan, George H.W.Bush, Bill Clinton, Bush/Cheney, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, each and every one, spent their time in the White House mostly in slippers at the back door, calling “Here, kitty, kitty….here, kitty kitty, kitty kitty….”

The Federal Reserve, as an institution, is full of wise people like those who wrote this report, but since the days of Alan Greenspan, it has been run by what can only be described as crazy right-wing voodoo grifter zealots. Have you caught the news that the Federal Reserve is now investing in the stock market? It’s true. This news sounds anodyne, but let me re-phrase it in terms that drive home what a destructive crime against humanity this innovation is: the king’s ministers are dumping poison into the city water supply, in order to kill everybody and seize their wealth. If Americans heard this message, would they rise up against the Fed? Oh…Flint. Forget it.

See the cat! Feel the Bern! I mean — er,……Vote for Biden.