Grist For The Mill, Part Two — Chapman’s Millrace

THE DISMAL SCIENCE DEPT./
THE THEATRE OF CONVERSION

THE RELUCTANT PIRATE

Joseph John Chapman was a Boston able seaman, a wharf rat trained in shipbuilding, mechanics, blacksmithing. In 1811, when he was 27, in what seems to have been an idealistic fit of democratic ardor, he sailed for Argentina to join the Bolivarian revolution against colonial Spain. Somehow Chapman ended up joining the crew of Hippolyte Bouchard, the “revolutionary pirate.”

Bouchard’s was a ship of fools, an invasive Foreign Legion, a corsair in the cause of libertad. In November 1818, Bouchard and his piratical crew, including Chapman, sailed down the coast of California, burning towns, threatening missions, and plundering lands. It was a daft attempt to liberate Spain’s beleaguered colonies by destroying them.

On a shore raid north of Santa Barbara, at Refugio, pictured above, Chapman was captured by the Californians. Somehow he convinced them he was harmless, and and had skills; anyway the clever Yankee prisoner was set to work in 1820 building new mills for Mission Santa Inez — a fulling mill and a grist mill. Fr. Zalvidea’s success with the Molino Viejo at San Gabriel had proved they could help a Mission grow.

Finished by 1822, Chapman’s mills were superb. And gorgeous. Which is modernism.

Chapman was granted amnesty by Gov. Sola, and immediately became known as the finest mechanic and construction foreman in Alta California. Shockingly, he then eloped on a sloop with Guadalupe Ortega y Sanchez, the belle of California. Her father had founded Santa Barbara! Chapman was not Catholic! When the couple were apprehended at San Pedro, Chapman reportedly faced a shot-gun conversion to Catholicism, and a re-wedding ceremony at La Placita church in LA. Perhaps in penance, Chapman was set to finish the framing of the roof of La Reina de Los Angeles. Chapman and a crew rode up into the San Gabriels, logged out timbers, hauled them by ox back to LA. He may even have agreed to pay for the bell he yoked in the belfry. In December, 1822, La Placita was finally finished, and the bell rung for a solemn and festive re-dedication procession, with all the citizens from miles around.

La Placita was an assitencia of San Gabriel; and when Fr. Zalvidea saw the fine job being done on the roofing, he gave Chapman his next job, building San Gabriel’s new mill — El Molino Nuevo — to replace the abandoned El Molino Viejo. (In the intervening years, the poor neophyte girls had gone back to rolling grains with metates, per George James Wharton). So between 1822-1824, the Yankee pirate-turned-millwright, dammed, dug, delved, daubed and did it.

With this mill right in the Mission’s front yard (above, middle right), Fr. Zalvidea had finally achieved his goal of bringing modern — indeed, state-of-the-art — capital improvement to replace the old wasteful production process of the province’s most necessary commodity. And Chapman didn’t just build the mill and the dam, he helped frame all the other new buildings, and even the famous Indian-crewed schooner, the “Guadelupe,” out of San Pedro, the perfect coasting-vessel to market their produce.

But 1822, Chapman’s banner year, also brought ominous rumblings to California from distant Mexico City. The anti-colonial Bolivarian revolution that Chapman had supported, had finally convulsed Mexico. The new republic was committed to overthrowing the Mission system entirely. Californians were naturally pro-Spanish, especially the Spanish-born Franciscans. It took 25 more years, and the American invasion, to absolutely put an end to the Missions. During those years, California grew, diversified, secularized. And the Californio mentality began to change: Spanish citizens were suspect, including the sullen conservative friars that were left in the province. Many Franciscans left California, and the Indians wandered away from the crumbling Missions.

Meanwhile, in 1824, a respected and solid and even admired citizen, settled down in the Pueblo with one of the most lovely brides California ever knew. The next year, when the river shifted course, the Chapmans were among the first to set up vineyards in the old river bottomland, that sun-drenched new strip adjacent to the Pueblo where they founded the California wine industry with cuttings of Fr. Zalvidea’s famous vina madre, the mother vine that still drapes the Pueblo in green today.

In 1826, with San Gabriel soaring to new prosperity because of his agricultural improvements and his ruthless organizational plan of native alcaldes driving teams of neophytes on set projects, Fr. Zalvidea seems to have had a nervous breakdown. He was “retired” without duties to San Juan Capistrano, then in 1842 to San Luis Rey. His mind had completely retired from reality; witnesses reported he would swat away demons, and scourge himself ritually (as did Serra), and sit entranced, occasionally shouting a scrap of prayer. Others thought him completely sane, only a bit lost in mysticism. Like most Franciscans, he never accepted the concept of Mexican California or the secularization of the Missions; the irony being, that his efforts to build a modern foodstuffs-shipping corporation at San Gabriel, had been itself, that process of secularization. And as we shall see, with the Missions winding down, the center of production shifted to the towns, particularly El Pueblo de La Reina de los Angeles.

NEXT PART: “Capital; Milling; Capitol Milling!”

Happy Halloween, And Peace For The Dead

In memoriam Richard Martin

Mom and Dad shared with all of their kids, their own love of American history and the importance and fun of celebrating social customs. Dad took me trick-or-treating for the first time with Chris in 1969. Dad carried a flashlight and we boys were dressed as cowboys and Indians and I’ve loved Halloween and the West, and bandanas, ever since. Bless you Dad, thank you sir, rest in peace.

By the tricks of goblins, Larry Freedman joined me, and our treat (his treat) was a stroll around the Plaza and French-dip lamb with bleu cheese and Lagunitas at Phillipe’s! First restaurant (parking lot-beer garden) since Covid-19.

During 30 years of living in LA I’ve watched Dias de los Muertos observances move from underground to mainstream. Since LA’s monuments are often draped in skulls this time of year, I’ve come to love it as a special time, an invitation to honor the pioneers’ struggles and to learn their wisdoms.

This year, Halloween just didn’t exist. Nobody was in costume, no parties, no trick-or-treaters, no giggling Cleopatras getting into Ubers on the corner. With coronavirus aflame in lungs across the land, it is impossible to celebrate Halloween; bobbing for apples is right out. But it’s still the most beautiful season to honor the dead. I went to San Gabriel Mission, mother of Los Angeles.

The dead who built Mission San Gabriel, and Los Angeles, who lie in this historic cemetery, and at La Placita, are sending generations worth of bi-lingual love and the special grace of the Angels, to poor gutted-out Mission San Gabriel. I was happy to see a first-class historic preservation team is at work putting up a temporary roof against the advent of the rains — while they….figure out how to save the building.

Grist For The Mill: Part One

THE DISMAL SCIENCE DEPT./
THE THEATRE OF CONVERSION

EVERY FRENCHMAN HAS ONE

Before 1786 there were no grain mills in California. But in that year a probably excellent (French?) hand-mill was offered as a gift to the Indian women at Mission San Carlos in Carmel. The donor was a (French!) naval commander and philosophe, Fleuriot Vicomte de Langle, captain of L’Astrolabe, second ship of the La Perouse Expedition. The explorers had paid an unexpected anchor-call in Monterey Bay, on the voyage royale of Pacific exploration. Anyway, de Langle just happened to have a hand-mill on hand (French!).

Enacting the ritual of a State Visit, with all the retainers en revue.

Fr. Fermin Lasuen, the second Father President of the Missions invited the French officer party to tour Mission San Carlos of Carmel, and received them formally, like a prelate-grandee. The French were impressed that Spain had done anything in California at all; but La Perouse and his crew were dismayed by the sullen, demoralized Indians; and by the fires-of-hell theology there were being indoctrinated with, and also the unproductive authoritarian agriculture of the place.

La Perouse receiving the commission from King Louis XVI. He pretends not to notice that His Most Christian Majesty is eagerly pointing to the wrong ocean.

Capt. de Langle was especially galled that the Indian girl neophytes were working all day rolling grain — probably wheat and barley — with metates, Mexico-style, to make flour. Franciscans at the different Missions, of course, had different attitudes to labor saving devices; but Carmel was Fr. Serra’s and Fr. Lasuen’s own HQ, so the regime — work is holy — was spartan here. The French saw it as backwards. In Europe, America, Chile, even in Mexico, farmers and landlords were experimenting with scientific agriculture and terraforming for maximum yields and breeding new varieties and draining and enclosing lands, etc. The whole world had been boosting outputs and specializing and going over to cash-cropping for over a century. As the French noticed, this Georgic spirit was thin in Franciscan California, much to the frustration of the civil authorities at Monterey. Developing modern agriculture was just not a Franciscan goal — yet. Anyway the Indians had little incentive to work efficiently at their goal of becoming peasants, with their only reward, it seemed, ever more of the curse of Adam’s toil:

Besides the socially-ritualized and religious call to the hunt, Indians longed for the fantastic variety of carb and protein sources in costal sage scrub, which evolved right along with the Indians. Beautiful buckwheat, sage seeds by the basketful — delicious, nutritious foods. Here’s some Indian staples I found just on a random half-hour hike recently around the Rio Hondo near the old San Gabriel Mission site. I wasn’t even looking for food, but, on reView, practically every plant I found beautiful, was also edible:

But the scrub, and the scrub’s ability to nurture non-Mission Indians, soon collapsed under the weight of millions of hooves, ox-tillage, soil-depleting crops, and the lightning-fast spread of the odious Spanish Pasture Mix of invasive fodder weeds.
In just a few generations, Indians outside the Missions were facing long odds to keep independent and to keep their food-ways alive in a transforming landscape. And inside the Missions, they faced disease and the sullen demoralization of a work regime set to the clang of bells.



Capt. de Langle’s mill may have been just cluttering up the Astrolabe’s hold, but for California, it was a gentle push into the future. The Indians and Franciscans alike expressed wonder to see it work, as it clearly dawned upon them that with this mill, their community suddenly could — and did, henceforth — multiply their flour output many times over. It freed the girls for a whole new roster of back-breaking jobs! It may also have been at that moment, that the noted California preference for wheat over maize tortillas was determined.

capital – wealth from the past that has been stored up and carefully maintained in its value, specifically for the purpose of seeding it to create more wealth in the future.

— The VVV Dictionary of Organic Economics

A Franciscan of the College of San Fernando, Lasuen despised the French and resisted French thinking at all levels (science, materialism, atheism, nihilism, existentialism). But the French hand-mill embarrassed, in a sense, the Father President of the Missions into planning more economic production and storing food surpluses and promoting specialization of labor. The Missions simply had to find ways to put more tortillas on more mesas all across California.

EPILOGUE: It is sad, but sensational, to report that after the La Perouse Expedition sailed on from California, the ships visited the island of Samoa in December of 1787, and poor Vicomte de Langle was killed by the hostile natives. He remains genuinely mourned and honored as a hero in France. If the Samoans played their cards right, they might’ve gotten a hand-mill off the Vicomte. Maybe a nice omelet pan.

FATHER ZALVIDEA BUILDS HIS DREAM MILL

Now we’re in business! San Gabriel Archangel of the Temblors, founded 1771; on this site since 1775; the church 1818-22.

There were exceptions to the rule of low Mission productivity. After the French diplomatically sniffed at the medieval conditions of Carmel, Gov. Fages defended California to the Viceroy in Mexico City, by singling out Mission San Gabriel for commendation:

In 1806 Fr. Jose Maria Zalvidea was appointed to San Gabriel. A Basque from old Bilbao (Bilbao…Bilbao) Fr. Zalvidea was especially entrepreneurial. He wanted results and expected growth and demanded out-of-the-box thinking and not a buncha yes men and shirkers. Reportedly he was a visionary, talented himself and quick to spot talent, but a prick and a martinet who freely used corporal punishment as a team-building exercise. Between 1810 and 1815, Zalvidea deployed resources towards an enormous capital investment — significant neophyte labor and training-by-doing, much Franciscan research and design-by-doing, fees for the master craftsmen and artisans Lasuen had been luring to settle in the province, and community-wide hydro-planning. He would build them a permanent labor-saving tool, a modern water-powered grist mill, that would magnify the Mission’s output (and God, of course).

P.S., it worked, but it had issues. George Wharton James wrote that the mill was sited too low on the hill, making the building damp; and that Zalvidea’s unusual design somehow allowed the water from the wheel to sprinkle up into the flour. This meant a troop of girls had to tote the flour out in bowls to dry in the sun. But Indian labor was cheap and flour was dear, even if hand-batch-dried. Production increased until the inevitable unexpected California flood damaged the apparatus. Milling there was abandoned by 1818, but the idea was a success. Zalvidea was already shaping plans for a new mill, this time in the Mission yard.

EPILOGUE: The Old Mill survived abandonment, squatters, renovations. I was expecting to find a pile of adobes overgrown with weeds; I had no idea it had been fitted out as the clubhouse of Henry Huntington’s golf course, or that later in the 20s Mrs. Brehm, a Huntington heiress, renovated it as a stylish residence, then, just rented it out for 50 years. Ordinary folks lived here into the 1970s. Families. As renters! Sigh.
FUN FACT: The millstones were discovered lying around the grounds of the Huntington Gardens by none other than George S. Patton. He apparently grew up here, and as a boy, recalled seeing stones like these used in the neighborhood as mounting blocks. Realizing what they must be, he recovered them to the mill site. So update your Rolodex to add “historic sites archaeologist” and “California vernacular architecture expert” to Gen. Patton’s already densely-packed card. Meanwhile, enjoy our Sunset Magazine treatment of El Molino Viejo:

NEXT PART: Fr. Zalvidea finally builds his dream mill, by employing cunning Yankee know-how. But soon that cunning Yankee brings on some big-money competition to challenge the Mission’s market corner on wheat.

‘Two Economies’ by Wendell Berry

THE DISMAL SCIENCE DEPT.

Forgive another dispatch from the View’s hard-working but least popular department, but the boys down there — and of course Ms. Perkins — have been struggling with certain inchoate mysteries. These are certain elusive concepts — the dual economy, fugitive value — that, they say, are herein laid plain. It is certainly an elegant and inspiring read. Farmers and poets are the true economists, and Berry is all three.

Some time ago, in conversation with Wes Jackson in which we were
laboring to define the causes of the modern ruination of farmland, we
finally got around to the money economy. I said that an economy based
on energy would be more benign because it would be more comprehensive.
Wes would not agree. ‘An energy economy still wouldn’t be comprehensive
enough.’ ‘Well,’ I said, ‘then what kind of economy would be comprehensive
enough?’ He hesitated a moment, and then, grinning, said, ‘The Kingdom of
God.’

— Wendell Berry, “Two Economies,” 1988

http://www.worldwisdom.com/public/viewpdf/default.aspx?article-title=Two_Economies_by_Wendell_Berry.pdf

By the grace of Carolyn Raffensperger, a few years ago Damon and I were seated across from Mr. Berry at a banquet honoring Dr. Kirschenmann at Stone Barns. We were there to perform a cabaret honoring Fred, and he was there to give the inaugural address of the Kirschenmann Lecture Series after dinner. At dinner we chatted eagerly and sampled Dan Barber’s miracles of cuisine. Berry of course had only a vague idea of who we were, but it was only about twenty seconds before the subject of American folk music and the narrative tradition came up, and the ice was broken. Damon and I suddenly, to him, jumped up, said excuse us, and ran over to perform our floor show, or “musicale” as Berry called it. In the show I used an historical quote from a pamphlet written by the Westchester, NY native Bolton Hall to introduce Damon’s rousing “Howdy Neighbor, Happy Harvest.” I mentioned the title of Bolton Hall’s 1908 pamphlet was “A Little Land and a Living.

The show got a warm hand; but I was especially gratified when, in the auditorium afterwards, Mr. Berry began his speech by saying he hadn’t known what to title it; but after hearing the “musicale,” he decided to title his address “A Little Land and A Living.”
I mention this only to suggest that Mr. Berry is known by me to be open to title suggestions. Therefore, I suggest that the natural and useful title of this essay, the take-away theme, is not really “two economies,” valuable though that ida is; but rather the more important idea of “The Great Economy:”

“Though a human economy can evaluate, distribute, use, and preserve things of value,
it cannot make value. Value can originate only in the Great Economy. It is
true enough that humans can add value to natural things: We may transform
trees into boards, and transform boards into chairs, adding value at
each transformation. In a good human economy, these transformations
would be made by good work, which would be properly valued and the
workers properly rewarded. But a good human economy would recognize
at the same time that it was dealing all along with materials and powers
that it did not make. It did not make trees, and it did not make the intelligence
and talents of the human workers. What the humans have added at
every step is artificial, made by art, and though the value of art is critical
to human life, it is a secondary value. When humans presume to originate value, they make value that is first abstract and then false, tyrannical, and destructive of real value.”

— Wendell Berry, “Two Economies”